1. 01

    Choose a representative page

    Review an important service or appointment journey rather than only the homepage. Record the device context and method. A lightweight homepage does not prove that the page a campaign uses is equally usable.

  2. 02

    Locate the obstruction

    Identify slow images, blocking scripts, unstable layout, or unresponsive interactions where evidence supports the finding. Connect the issue to the reader’s task. Avoid removing a feature simply because its purpose is unfamiliar.

  3. 03

    Make a scoped change

    Use an appropriate backup and change only what the investigation supports. Preserve approved content, accessibility, and inquiry behavior. An optimization that hides an answer or breaks a form is not a successful improvement.

  4. 04

    Recheck the public experience

    Clear the affected cache and compare under similar conditions. Verify navigation, readable content, and essential interactions. Keep the result and limitations with the change so the next review has a dependable baseline.

A planning exercise, not a client result

Put the idea to work

Planning exercise: compressing a large decorative image improves loading, but a separate script still blocks the appointment control. Continue the task-based review. One better metric does not establish that the intended journey now works.

What to watch for

  • Optimizing only the homepage
  • Removing useful content to improve a score
  • Comparing results from different test conditions

Make the next review concrete.

Use the worksheet to record your observations, the evidence behind them, and the decision you want to make. Keep unresolved assumptions visible until they are checked.

Open this site’s worksheet →